013
*
(iT9qUT) 819* 110? Joan mij tab mood desû ads,zxood nojJoglios
no1 2991 9du JenJ 99% of ŁAJJino woŁ Jeft
2*
.Jq9#
[30] tednuo008 (170qong Lae bajoelios sr10# GJNET18#
Juo tieq asinos Jeáð 998 of tejting voy Jedl
CUPY.
Enclosure
IREC
0.0.
26441-611
Red 25 JUL 07
Magistracy,
Hongkong, 29th. May, 1907.
Dow Jam axc70 30 2Jasnɩkytovo lo stouter nol (lezat) add to
[70] bojnuodos lul tas ejaniqison edj od svo ti8g (1Jgnong
*70* 2J41000r Jeid see of injjino por Jødt
Lis 1.2ow anoijountant lefonents dJI* 9018t70008 ni vino touzai
Lonadmus Jilor reqɔng e mon】nd bluoda doua lie Jedd sarkivong 25
.(Tuare7] sið ja tavezi xood
udar qulupne Jquota exer of Esital way Jedt .*
Jaeads need snivad 11onde sailaoseda ndj to zocnejanuorio nij
avesi Jucti
s'noJontic0 Jsennooni tenofast vo、Jedi
Içrussori edt of ajnuos04
QE EVIS OJ ,vijaonsque,talia) woy JadT .or
cs to no1vpalico 91 1c noJJer 943 no nevajada norarvaequa
.09 Isl Ja suteven to 31921 2001tky sit 70? karjauos08
to nofaroso els no Janj Joy Laiwan of MR Í
at triananu) 979k woy Tray JEBL Nel fet qt 2c enorJeoistat adj
ford af danes odd sainielaxe enorJounident taliajot zUOITEV
eld rabun qjub nimij Jus vires ou kojo9qxe eren sjnejnucoca-dua
odu od (1987 quoc Jed♪ Jagupen of Eas anoiJoutjant i8190871*
hid ea .ejet acri *99# enc aiddia 01 OJ BI Ju98 90 (6# 9Vous
AdaJe to vede1000 od♪ OJ 19/40491 ad of evad lii* nejje
..995, I
,a02acft # [4 (18)
.(T#Jeric96 130100
Sir,
I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt
of your letter No. 2957/07 of the 21st instant, with reference to the recent defalcations of the shroff Ng Fung Fu, requesting me to show reason why I should not refund the amount missing to the Treasury, if it is found otherwise irrecoverable, and to give categorical answers to ten accusations which have been made against me in my capacity of Public Officer.
As the latter will to a large extent carry
with them the explanation of the forger, I will first do my best to answer them, as well as the nature of the charges permits, and will then state for what sums in the deficit, I wish to disclaim any responsibility.
1.
Financial Instruction No. 58 has reference
to 'officers other than the Treasurer and the sub-accountants who receive, in their public capacity, duties, licences, fees, rent, or other moneys', and does not therefore apply to my case, since I had been informed by the Treasurer that I was a sub-accountant of this kind. However, arrangements were authorised by His Excellency the Governor, on the Treasurer's advice, for the weekly transport of money to Hongkong, involving an average remittance of some $4,000, during the period of rent collection. The despatch of moneys from out-stations to Taipo was arranged by me and always punctually performed.
013
*
(iT9qUT) 819* 110? Joan mij tab mood desû ads,zxood nojJoglios
no1 2991 9du JenJ 99% of ŁAJJino woŁ Jeft
2*
.Jq9#
[30] tednuo008 (170qong Lae bajoelios sr10# GJNET18#
Juo tieq asinos Jeáð 998 of tejting voy Jedl
CUPY.
Enclosure
IREC
0.0.
26441-611
Red 25 JUL 07
Magistracy,
Hongkong, 29th. May, 1907.
Dow Jam axc70 30 2Jasnɩkytovo lo stouter nol (lezat) add to
[70] bojnuodos lul tas ejaniqison edj od svo ti8g (1Jgnong
*70* 2J41000r Jeid see of injjino por Jødt
Lis 1.2ow anoijountant lefonents dJI* 9018t70008 ni vino touzai
Lonadmus Jilor reqɔng e mon】 nd bluoda doua lie Jedd sarkivong 25
.(Tuare7] sið ja tavezi xood
udar qulupne Jquota exer of Esital way Jedt .*
Jaeads need snivad 11onde sailaoseda ndj to zocnejanuorio nij
avesi Jucti
s'noJontic0 Jsennooni tenofast vo、 Jedi
Içrussori edt of ajnuos04
QE EVIS OJ ,vijaonsque,talia) woy JadT .or
cs to no1vpalico 91 1c noJJer 943 no nevajada norarvaequa
.09 Isl Ja suteven to 31921 2001tky sit 70? karjauos08
to nofaroso els no Janj Joy Laiwan of MR Í
at triananu) 979k woy Tray JEBL Nel fet qt 2c enorJeoistat adj
ford af danes odd sainielaxe enorJounident taliajot zUOITEV
eld rabun qjub nimij Jus vires ou kojo9qxe eren sjnejnucoca-dua
odu od (1987 quoc Jed♪ Jagupen of Eas anoiJoutjant i8190871*
hid ea .ejet acri *99# enc aiddia 01 OJ BI Ju98 90 (6# 9Vous
AdaJe to vede1000 od♪ OJ 19/40491 ad of evad lii* nejje
..995, I
,a02acft # [4 (18)
.(T#Jeric96 130100
Sir,
I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt
of your letter No. 2957/07 of the 21st, instant with reference to the recent defalcations of the shroff Ng Fung Fu, requesting me to show reason why 1 should not refund the amount rissing to the Treasury, if it is found otherwise irrecoverable, and to give categorical answers to ten accusations which have been rale against me in my capacity of Public Officer.
As the latter will to a large extent carry
with them the explanation of the forger, I will first do my best to answer then, as well as the nature of the charges permits, and will then state for what sums in the deficit, I wish to dis-
-clair any responsibility.
1.
Financial Instruction No. 58 has reference
to 'officers other than the Treasurer and the sub-accountants who receive, in their public capacity, duties, licences, fees, rent, or other moneys', and does not therefore apply to my case, since I had been informed by the Treasurer that I was a sub- -accountant of this kind. However arrangements were authorised by His Excellency the Governor, on the Treasurer's advice, for the weekly transport of money to Hongkong, involving an average remittance of some $4,000, during the period of rent collection. The despatch of moneys from out-stations to Taipo was arranged by me and always punctually perforred.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.